Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2016. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 December 2016

TOP 10 MOVIES OF THIS YEAR!!!!

My top 10 movies of this year!
These are based of what I believe for me were the best of the best films of 2016!!!

Heads up - I haven't seen Hacksaw Ridge, La La Land, Silence and many more becasue they all get released January!

10) Deadpool


Deapool kicks off this list. With it's fun and meta jokes, this was a character that I don't even like but the movie won me over.

9) The Revenant


Leo deserved his Oscar with a great performance accompanied by the ever great Tom Hardy. Also the cinematography was breath taking.

8) Bridge of Spies


A master class on how to direct with Steven Spielberg and a master class on how to act with Tom Hanks and Mark Rylance.

7) The Witch


Scary, tense and uneasy. The best horror movie of the year.

6) Captain America: Civil War


A Superhero movie done right. Balancing a lot of heroes isn't easy but the Russo's are becoming experts at it.

5) The Hateful Eight


Tarantino knows how to direct and tell stories. Not his best but is still unparalleled by most films.

4) Arrival


Arrival proves the Denise Villeneuve is a director to be reckoned with. The best Sci-Fi movie of the year. A film that relies on language rather than explosions for excitement is exciting.

3) The Neon Demon 


The most underrated and most polarizing film of the year. You either love Nicolas Windin Refn films or hate them. I love his movies. Especially this one.

2) Nocturnal Animals


One of the most powerful performances from anyone this year. Jake Gyllenhaal steals the show with Micheal Shannon. So depressing but very powerful.

1) Your Name


Just beautiful. 'Nuff said.

Your Name (Kimi No Na Wa) 2016 Review


Your Name is a beautiful piece of film that needs to watched by everyone on Earth. 


Directed by Makoto Shinkai it tells the story of Mitsuha Miyamizu who wishes she could change her life to be a boy from Tokyo and for her the wish becomes true. But do not mistake this for a run of the mill body switch story. Nope. This is crafted masterfully to tell a unique story about love and friendship.

To begin, the animation is stunning and like the movie is beautiful to stare at and leaves you with vivid imagery that will stay in your minds and heart for life. I have seen generic stories told in generic ways, I am always pleased when a movie maker decides to change the ingredients and spice it up and with this film the changes make a whole lot of difference.

Told in both perspectives from Mitsuha who enters the boy (Taki Tachibana) and vice versa, it's funny and warm. Your Name is full emotions that leave you weeping to laughing. The roller coaster you are set on takes many turns and leaves you with characters that you root for from the moment you are introduced to them. 

To give too much away will be an injustice for this film. So my advice is go to a cinema or buy it or rent it and support it and just enjoy this masterful and beautiful film.

This is seriously a special movie. 

This was short because I want all of you to go and just enjoy every little detail for yourself. I'm currently listening to the heart warming score right now while typing this review. 

​

Best film of the year!!

Monday, 7 November 2016

Why has Mediocre become Acceptable?

Furious 7, Iron Man 3, Minions and Transformers: Dark of the Moon have all made over 1 billion at the box office. More than The Dark Knight, Drive, The Wolf of Wall Street and Inside Out. How did it get this bad?

We have the power to dictate what studios release. We refused to watch Ghostbusters (2016) and no more will be made. Yet we never do this often. We all complain about the influx of terrible movies but we're the ones fueling studios to keep making them. Have we just accepted mediocre as normal?

With so many studios wanting to build their own universe, it has seemed that they want to rush an important step; quality. This is the same with us - we want different characters to cross-over in other movies that we accept that bad movies will happen in order for them to cross-over. "Who cares if Iron Man 2 was bad at least he'll be in Avengers" - Sound familiar?

The quality in which we as the audience accept a film has dramatically declined. As it seems the standard of a film no longer matters but instead it has come to who stars in the film or if it's a character we recognize that gets us to the cinema. I am no saint and often do that too. If it's a star I know then I'll probably watch that movie over an independent masterpiece with no one recognizable. This has fueled Hollywood to keep making these generic movies that have no personality. However, the studios are not the only ones to blame as it may also be down to everyone being over sensitive, leading to studios having to hit every demographic in order to make some money. But we can change that by opening our minds and allowing different ideas on the screen.

You cannot sensor art.

Art is expression and freedom and once you sensor that then we live in a world where free speech doesn't exist.

Our over sensitive minds means studios will cater to them. If a studio allows a risky move in their movies, you can guarantee backlash and boycotts from audiences which studios do not want. An example is The Interview, which had such a backlash that cinemas didn't play it and Sony got hacked. This has put fear in studios not wanting a similar situation which means they would rather make a generic movie than push the bar of creativity.

As the audience we have power. We have to stop buying tickets for the generic crap and demand something different. If we support more creative films (even bad ones to a degree) then studios will have to consider making more dynamic and inventive pieces of art. We shouldn't accept mediocre but instead films that push the medium to more imaginative places. But before we change the studios, we have to change ourselves.



Remember, If we don't change now, we are one step closer to a Citizen Kane remake. Think about that.

Wednesday, 2 November 2016

The Problem with Doctor Strange



*CONTAINS SPOILERS*

Doctor Strange is the third in Marvel's phase three line up. It stars Benedict Cumberbatch as Steven Strange and is about his recovery and enlightenment with the help of The Ancient One (Tilda Swinton). The movie has spectacular visuals and choreography that transport audiences to new realities but it has some problems that made this film a 'good' film but not a 'mind blowing' one. 


When I watch a movie, I judge it on how the movie was directed and if the story was interesting. I do not judge a movie on, if they got a certain character correct or if they put some Easter eggs in there. This is no different to comic book movies. I don't care if a movie has got Batman correct because if the movie sucks then the movie sucks.


I have no knowledge of Doctor Strange so I watch this movie as I would any other by not knowing that much about our main protagonist. Which the movie doesn't help, Doctor Strange has no character arc. This is shown when he only struggles with his powers for about five minutes and he masters the skill of magic in about 15 minutes. There's no struggle nor does he change his ways to become more skilled. He just achieves master level in minutes.


A struggle of a character who has worked hard to earn his skill helps create tension however Dr Strange does not struggle meaning there is no conflict with his inner-self. He doesn't beat his demons because he never changes throughout the movie. He stays the same man from beginning to end. The only thing he learnt was there's something bigger out there.


I hate it when these movies have the whole world at stake. THIS DOES NOT CREATE TENSION! It's boring because I don't care if everyone dies as I don't know them.


Making a movie smaller is not a bad thing. It actually means the stakes are bigger for our protagonist. Doctor Strange should make a hard decision to save the people or person he loves or cares for, not the world because who cares? The movie should have focused on Strange and Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams) because they have a deeper relationship that we as the audience can relate to. How many of you go out and save the entire world? and how many of you would sacrifice yourself for the people you love?



In The Dark Knight Rises, Chris Nolan shows that even an entire city can still have stakes involved. But how they do it, which Doctor Strange fails to do, is establish other characters and their world. In The Dark Knight Rises, we see other characters interact in their world, from Gordon, Blake and Foley. They all have something to lose if they fail. Batman doesn't save the entire world, he save his city. A place we have seen throughout the entire trilogy, not like Hong Kong for Doctor Strange. He wants to save his legacy and the people he cares for. For a third movie in a superhero trilogy, it was small compared to Doctor Strange and it worked in their favor. The movie focuses on a few characters and allowing us to see what they can lose. 


In Doctor Strange, we see he cares for Christine, but the threat is in Hong Kong. Thousands of miles away from her. She's not in harms way nor does she know what is happening. The giant CG blob fest was neat to look at but it never transmitted fear. The bomb in The Dark Knight Rises was ticking and every second lost was a step closer to everyone's loved ones being dead. For Doctor Strange I had no idea what was happening because they weren't clear on the outcome. 

With all these world shattering threats, what will make Infinity Wars stand out? 

I also want to compare it with Interstellar. Both relied on visuals to push the story but Interstellar is much more effective because of the emotional connection we see with Coop and Murph. That was missing in Doctor Strange. There was no emotional connection between him and Christine. They had a fling in the past and she does mean something to him but we never see anything that really shows us their connection. They never have time to themselves and discuss their past and maybe their future. She is ultimately forgotten and without the emotion, a movie loses it soul.


How Doctor Strange beat Dormammu was pathetic. I have no problems with rewinding time - I enjoyed the battle when time was reversed and we see that effecting the fight. But the loop was unforgivable. This is where I don't judge a movie by how comic accurate they are but by how well they are made. Doctor Strange fans probably know what that necklace power is capable off - but for me they did not establish enough rules. The biggest one is - how did he stop the loop? They never show us and they probably didn't know themselves. It took me right out the movie because of how ridiculous it was. Film is a visual medium, show us the important parts! 

On the other hand if they wanted to go down the 'Earth in danger route', there was only one way to make this movie incredibly ballsy. Replace Dormammu with Thanos. At first when Steven Strange went on his acid trip, I thought he saw the impending doom of Thanos, this got me super excited but alas I was wrong.



Instead of having Dormammu, making Thanos the antagonist and losing to Doctor Strange shows that Thanos needs the infinity gems because he is not strong enough without them. By making Doctor Strange defeat Thanos it gives him the important role of guiding the Avengers because Strange would have the know how to defeat him. It would have shown the importance of the gems and how far Thanos would go to collect all of them. With Thanos defeated, he would come back angrier and wary of Earth's threat making him a more fierce villain. 

Overall Doctor Strange was a good movie. It focused more on the visuals then the story and for that it lost its emotional footing. The movie lacked heart and lost itself in the Marvel formula. Mads Mikkelsen was sorely wasted and should have been the only antagonist. A more emotional story with those visuals would have created a gripping movie from start to end.

But I do recommend you watch it and see for yourself.